← Search

Caryn Cohen

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 59W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caryn Cohen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Qi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Qi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Qi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Patrick Maginnis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · WHRC-Nakatani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawan Pandya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · NOR-WHRC-Moreno · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Maginnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Margaret Convery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Margaret Convery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-04 · WHRC-Nakatani · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jinmi Kemple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · NOR-WHRC-Moreno · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Maginnis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · WHRC-Nakatani · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawan Pandya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · WHRC-Ha · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Misug Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.4% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.4% of games
6.0
100%
7W–0L · 69.5% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.3% of games
7.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 69.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer