Search

Janice Ackley

Gresham, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
89 matches · 37W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
82%
stay 3.0
18%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 3.0
195 of 600

Janice is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams92 teams · 2001–2026
CAC-Schmidt/Hevia
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
CAC-Bray
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
CAC-Bray
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
CAC-Bray
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
CAC-Bray
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
CAC-Ramsey
2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janice has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Janice has gone from the 74th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
37%
17W–29L · 43.6% of games
7.0
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history89 matches
W
Anh Nguyen / MICHELLE LY
2026-06-07 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
+0.073better than expected — took 45% of games against 29% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Larson
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-06-22 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Hallock Koppelman
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-14 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
0.034below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Marlene Enos / Angela Fogg
2025-06-07 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nguyen
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryke Schmidt
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-03-08 · CAC-Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
0.003below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-02-01 · CAC-Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Snyder
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-01-10 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marje Ferek
0.038below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2024-06-14 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Greenblatt
0.030below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-04-28 · CAC-Ramsey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Fisher
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.