← Search

Janice Ackley

Gresham, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 37W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janice Ackley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-06-07 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · CAC-Schmidt/Hevia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-22 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Hallock Koppelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-14 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Degnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-07 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · CAC-Bray · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryke Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-08 · CAC-Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-01 · CAC-Bray · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-01-10 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marje Ferek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2024-06-14 · CAC-Bray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Greenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-04-28 · CAC-Ramsey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
37%
17W–29L · 43.6% of games
7.0
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal