Search

Michelle Posey

Bend, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
119 matches · 76W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
55%
down to 3.5
45%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 33% down · 67% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Higher than today’s 3.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bend · 4.0
6 of 6
OR · 4.0
461 of 498

Michelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams36 teams · 2013–2026
MAC-Brown/Kim
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2026
MAC-Keljo/Pierce
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2026
MAC-Hasle/Doherty
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Doherty/Hasle
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Bounds/Popma
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
MAC-Doherty/Hasle
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michelle has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Michelle has gone from the 39th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
71.4%
55W–22L · 57.8% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-03-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hasle
+0.041better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with June Kim
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Pickard
+0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-21 · MAC-Hasle/Doherty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina McMenamin
+0.026better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Lydia Pia / Rachel Ritchie
2025-05-02 · MAC-Hasle/Doherty · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lahti
0.051below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-04-12 · MAC-Hasle/Doherty · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lahti
+0.023better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Julie Hansen / Paula Petrica
2025-04-05 · MAC-Hasle/Doherty · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Miller
0.009below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-02-23 · MAC-Doherty/Hasle · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanette Thomas
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-15 · MAC-Doherty/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
0.036below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-11 · MAC-Doherty/Hasle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Miller
0.090below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-01-04 · MAC-Doherty/Hasle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
+0.054better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with Caroline Popma
+0.031better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.