← Search

Robby Lafleur

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 53W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robby Lafleur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-06-06 · WHRC-Leong · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Leong · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-26 · WHRC-Leong · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-27 · WHRC-Leong · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-20 · WHRC-Thayer/Adcock · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Kana Wakamatsu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Kana Wakamatsu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-26 · WHRC-Vargas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-21 · WHRC-Vargas · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-10 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stanley Mo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Erika Finrow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
N/A
2025-08-03 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.9% of games
4.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.5% of games
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.1% of games
8.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer