Search

June Kim

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
36 matches · 20W–16L · seasons 20192026
Where June sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

June is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams26 teams · 2015–2026
MAC-Keljo/Pierce
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2026
MAC-Luthi/Wilcox
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2024
MAC-Luthi/Pickard
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2024
N OR-MAC-Lovett
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2023
MAC-Wilcox/Lovett
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women
2023
MAC-Thomas
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

June has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, June has gone from the 33rd to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-02-07 · MAC-Keljo/Pierce · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Posey
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-04-27 · MAC-Luthi/Pickard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Pickard
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 4-2
W
2024-03-29 · MAC-Luthi/Wilcox · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
+0.013better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-23 · MAC-Luthi/Wilcox · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-08-25 · MAC-Wilcox/Lovett · #1 Doubles · with Terri Gotcher
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-06-17 · N OR-MAC-Lovett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Gotcher
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Cathy Valentine / Kori Montpas
2023-04-29 · N OR-MAC-Lovett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Gotcher
+0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-16 · N OR-MAC-Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Wang
+0.098better than expected — took 80% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-03-18 · MAC-Wilcox/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Gotcher
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2023-01-28 · MAC-Wilcox/Lovett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Gotcher
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-01-15 · MAC-Wilcox/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Pierce
0.041below expectation — took 52% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-20 · JANSKY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Gotcher
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.