Teams

JANSKY

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kim Hasle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Courtney Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Convery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
June Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Susie Jansky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2022-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Convery / Courtney Pierce vs Molly Odonnell / Laura Rundle6-3, 6-0
2022-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Kim Hasle vs Nancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Terri Gotcher vs Angie Lee / Julie Hansen7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Gotcher / June Kim vs Jeanette Thomas / Katy Marcy7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Gotcher / June Kim vs Kathleen Budnick / Nancy Atkins4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Kim Hasle vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Brooke Moffenbeier6-4, 6-4
2022-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Convery / Courtney Pierce vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-4, 6-4
2022-06-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Jansky / Kim Hasle vs Lori Bernhardt / Megan Meagher3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Hasle
44W–28L career
5%91%5%
3.78
4
Courtney Pierce
28W–24L career
2%97%1%
3.76
4
Amy Convery
20W–10L career
not enough data
4
June Kim
20W–16L career
not enough data
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.