← Teams

MAC-Luthi/Wilcox

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.04 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Darci Keljo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Courtney Pierce
published 4
—
June Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Kim Stevens
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Michaela Bancud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Laura Luthi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Geraldine Carter
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Terri Pickard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.18
Kathryn Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
Results11 ties
2024-09-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Terri Pickard vs Lolly Bates / Denise Kaestle6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-13Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Terri Pickard vs Sheryl Fewkes / Janey Evans6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTerri Pickard / Nenette Olson vs Judy Knox / Rise Hawley6-3, 7-5
2024-03-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Heidi Wilcox vs Christy Strange / Mary Klinger6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Elizabeth Lilly vs Angie Stromquist / Cate Harrington6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJean Herbst / June Kim vs Sharon Mathew / Sara van Beckum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Kathryn Wilson vs Julie Bradford / Beth Steffes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJune Kim / Catherine Go vs Cheryl Roloff / Julie Hanson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Luthi / Michaela Bancud vs Kara Gajowskyj / Ellen Bowman6-3, 6-1
2024-03-10Won 2–1
L#1 SinglesKathryn Wilson vs Aracelia Hettle6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Darci Keljo vs Carrie Fisher / Lynne Gaerisch6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTerri Pickard / Sheila Anderson vs Sara Swanborn / Nancy Korenek-Leveque6-3, 6-4
2024-02-24Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesCourtney Pierce / Geraldine Carter vs May Albano / Danielle Cuenco7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Bell / Heidi Wilcox vs Kristen Kopack / Carrie Putsch3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKim Stevens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTerri Pickard / Elizabeth Lilly vs Jeanne-Sarah DeLarquier / Susan Gabe7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-02-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Catherine Go vs Estera Clark / Casey Cobb4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Luthi / Terri Pickard vs Babette Zielinski / Gabriela Ghita6-1, 6-0
2024-02-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLaura Luthi / Darci Keljo vs Beth Steffes / Julie Bradford7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCourtney Pierce / Geraldine Carter vs Tonya Halog / Margaret Sivertsen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Elizabeth Lilly vs Kathleen Murrin / Cheryl Roloff6-3, 6-2
2024-02-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDarci Keljo / Geraldine Carter vs Adina Talpos / Tanya Wong6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Go / Linda Lovett vs Brandie Hill / Brianna Hill6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClaire Bell / Michaela Bancud vs Katherine Kralj / Lisa Clevenger4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesLaura Luthi / Terri Pickard vs Nikki Nadig / Carol Chiu6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4
Courtney Pierce
28W–24L career
2%97%1%
3.76
4
June Kim
20W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Michaela Bancud
26W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Laura Luthi
30W–28L career
10%90%0%
3.62
4
Geraldine Carter
29W–28L career
20%80%1%
3.61
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Terri Pickard
44W–44L career
52%48%0%
3.43
4.5
Kathryn Wilson
32W–26L career
100%0%0%
3.18

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.