Search

Jessica Miller

CAMAS, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
35 matches · 18W–17L · seasons 20192024
Where Jessica sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jessica is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jessica has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jessica has gone from the 64th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
W
2024-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Richman
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-01-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Vargas
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-10-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Brundage
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 62% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Vargas
0.051below expectation — took 52% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kris Kelly-Koster
0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Holly Miele / Kathleen Murrin
2023-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robby Lafleur
+0.044better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Lynch
+0.050better than expected — took 58% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Alpern
0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Towle
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Estera Clark / Mary Green-Zwemke
2023-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Rothert
0.011below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Katherine Weinfurter / Jing Feng
2023-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Rivares
0.058below expectation — took 48% of games against 70% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.037better than expected — took 44% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.