← Teams

IRV-Lyon

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Deborah Naugler
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.78
Libby North
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Lisa Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Tara Hendrickson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Char Riley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jen Woods
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-03-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDeborah Naugler / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Katherine Kralj / Tami McAra5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Maureen Busby6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Mary Elliott vs Penny Birkhofer / Michele Snyder6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJana Corder / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Tao Hua / Kaelin Teo6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLibby North vs Molly Odonnell6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJen Woods / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Aleli Siruno / Kristin Spear3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-20Won 3–2
L#1 DoublesJessica Miller / Char Riley vs Stephanie Leeding / Gina Wissmiller6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLibby North vs Pam Saftler6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Jana Corder vs Amy Wang / Shannon Bilstrom6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesRebecca Martinez Griffin vs Jean Herbst6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Elliott / Jen Woods vs Linda Lovett / Courtney Pierce6-4, 6-3
2022-02-18Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesTara Hendrickson / Jen Woods vs Loo Yah Leong / Heike Droste6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLibby North vs Erika Finrow6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Char Riley vs Linda Barr / Judith Kobin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deborah Naugler vs Jopie van Hameren / Shannon Berry6-1, 6-3
2022-02-06Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Halle Jackson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Cathy Porter vs Sarah Yu / Sarah Carrato7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler vs Aleina Tanabe / Kathryn Stockbower7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJana Corder / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Kristin de Baldo / Kristin Head7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDeborah Naugler vs Carrie Willis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJen Woods / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Theresa Mallari / Kaytlynn Kolb2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-01-29Split 2–2
L#1 SinglesLibby North vs Ellen Pearson - (DQ)*6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Porter / Char Riley vs Casey Cobb / Gina Meyer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDeborah Naugler vs Michelle Dombek6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deirdre Harms vs Christina Wright / Michele Hart6-4, 6-4
2022-01-22Won 3–1
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Kalynn Belden6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Miller / Deborah Naugler vs Philippa Stasiuk / Sheila McCarroll7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRebecca Martinez Griffin vs Cindy del Rosario6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAntoinette Ann Reno / Jen Woods vs Dongju Won / Paula Watt6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Deborah Naugler
98W–63L career
5%95%0%
4.07
4.5
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
96W–58L career
19%81%0%
3.98
4
Libby North
51W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Tara Hendrickson
71W–65L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
0
Jen Woods
11W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.