← Teams

WHRC-Corley

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Susan Suttich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Alena Lauritsen
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.50
Anita Rockwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Joelle Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
Suzanne Chambers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen McNairy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-06-14Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Chambers vs Ellen Bowman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Mary Lowblad vs Cheryl Roloff / Sharon Kim-Geib6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesEdwardeen Hilts / Judi Babcock vs Leigh Anderson / Leslie Lynch6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSuzanne Chambers vs Jennifer Petersen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren McNairy / Alena Lauritsen vs Emily McBride / Kris Kelly-Koster6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-01Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesSusan Suttich / Monica Rivares vs Lori D'Antonio / Terri Bashkingy6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Chambers vs Rebecca Griffith6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStarlyn Corley / Anita Rockwell vs Carol Chiu / Rochelle Pluymers7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlena Lauritsen / Rebecca Roberts vs Lisa Provost / Janet Mills6-4, 7-5
2024-05-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Suttich / Joelle Lewis vs Seungja Shin / Aleli Siruno6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAlena Lauritsen vs Bo Yu6-3, 6-1
2024-05-11Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesAlena Lauritsen vs Abby Swancutt6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Penny Birkhofer / Crystal Bryant6-3, 7-5
2024-05-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Rebecca Roberts vs Beth Steffes / Ellen Bowman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudi Babcock / Edwardeen Hilts vs Suzanne Boss / Katherine Lomartire6-0, 6-0
2024-04-27Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKaren McNairy / Joelle Lewis vs Kate Jackson / Marie Sellke6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Suttich / Edwardeen Hilts vs Ariana White / Morgan Cowling6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStarlyn Corley / Anita Rockwell vs Kaie Wellman / Nina Hanson6-2, 6-3
2024-04-14Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesElisa Geller / Mary Lowblad vs Claire Bell / Courtney Pierce6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlena Lauritsen vs Pam Saftler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Terri Pickard / Sheila Anderson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Suttich / Michele Heinrichson vs Sally Lovett / Catherine Go7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.73
4
Susan Suttich
59W–35L career
9%91%0%
3.65
3.5
Alena Lauritsen
129W–74L career
0%67%33%
3.56
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%80%20%
3.50
4
Joelle Lewis
37W–46L career
39%61%0%
3.49
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Suzanne Chambers
80W–68L career
0%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.