← Teams

IRV-Lyon/Kayser

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.08 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Deborah Naugler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.98
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.78
Libby North
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Lisa Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Tara Hendrickson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Char Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jen Woods
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDeborah Naugler / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Diana Callaway / Sally Sterling6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChar Riley / Libby North vs June Kim / Susie Jansky6-3, 6-2
2022-06-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Lyon / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Ellen Bowman / Margaret Sivertsen6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLibby North vs Michelle Johnson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChar Riley / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Julie Bradford / Kara Gajowskyj1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler vs Teresa Jackson / Catherine Crosby6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLibby North vs Kristen Fisher3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Lyon / Char Riley vs Colleen Moss / Nancy Korenek-Leveque6-2, 6-4
2022-05-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChar Riley / Antoinette Ann Reno vs Julie Atchley / Nikki Nadig7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Naugler / Tara Hendrickson vs Carol Chiu / Kristin Head7-6, 6-4
2022-05-13Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Kristen Benkstein6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJen Woods / Jessica Miller vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Amy Bucher6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Martinez Griffin / Deborah Naugler vs Suzie Glenn / Kana Wakamatsu6-4, 6-2
2022-05-06Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesDeborah Naugler / Jana Corder vs Cassia Carpio / Xiaolu Huang6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLibby North vs Suzanne Chambers6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Ashleigh Kayser vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Loo Yah Leong6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Miller / Jen Woods vs Michele Sutherland / Robin Kaukonen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeborah Naugler / Rebecca Martinez Griffin vs Carrie Fisher / Wanda Nijholt6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChar Riley / Cathy Porter vs Lynn Sosa / Marie Picard6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTara Hendrickson / Amy Alpern - * vs Rochelle Hart / Susan Suttich6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-10Lost 1–2
W#1 SinglesTara Hendrickson vs Carrie Putsch6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Lyon / Deborah Naugler vs May Albano / Kristen Kopack6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Porter / Char Riley vs Jeanne-Sarah DeLarquier / Sarah Yu6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Deborah Naugler
98W–63L career
5%95%0%
4.07
4.5
Rebecca Martinez Griffin
96W–58L career
19%81%0%
3.98
4
Libby North
51W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Lisa Lyon
91W–68L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Tara Hendrickson
71W–65L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
0
Jen Woods
11W–7L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.