← Search

Julia Dreyfoos

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 8W–21L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-10-31 · CP-Czerwinski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Bystrom
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · CP-Czerwinski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Price
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-09 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Price
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-29 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethel Brende
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-01 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethel Brende
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-19 · CP-Lucky Charms-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Laursen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-10-27 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Pope
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-21 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Garnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
2023-05-01 · CP-Zens · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Fretwell
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-01-29 · CP-Bouton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Buckingham
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-02-12 · CP-Garnett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stanford
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer