← Search

Christine Garnett

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 85W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Garnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-08-02 · CP-Bouton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Du mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · CP-Bouton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Du mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-21 · CP-Bouton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Walt Paulson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Chiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Amy Hsu / Jingjing Cai
2026-05-09 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarika Calla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tessa Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · CP-TNT-Sikka · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-06 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Borgen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-13 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
44.3%
43W–54L · 48.6% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 49.9% of games
8.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
31.7%
13W–28L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#1 Singles
27%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
9%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova