Search

Tessa Chen

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
92 matches · 53W–39L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
21%
down to 3.0
79%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 13% down · 87% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.5
49 of 52
WA · 3.5
1279 of 1364

Tessa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tessa has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tessa has gone from the 75th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 52.4% of games
3.0
68.3%
28W–13L · 59.8% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
L
Tatjana Mullally / Elisabeth Odland
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Garnett
+0.014about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallica Sikka
+0.014about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallica Sikka
+0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Giuliana Guilherme / Mengye Guo
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallica Sikka
0.021below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hedi Carpenter
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Mary Dwyer / Kim Scott
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallica Sikka
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Ann Chen / Miri Rogers
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra Pandey
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mallica Sikka
+0.038better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Julia Schwartz / Amanda Kernanchamps
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · with Mingming Zhan
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Karen Rector / Katy Brownchamps
2025-10-19 · #3 Doubles · with Mingming Zhan
+0.020better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Mei Lin / Xuan Weichamps
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Mingming Zhan
0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jaime Simon / Eng Chungchamps
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · with Mingming Zhan
0.026below expectation — took 39% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.