← Search

Phillip Lu

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
118 matches · 55W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 2.5
96%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
31 of 31
WA · 3.0
726 of 755

Phillip is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Phillip has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Phillip has gone from the 5th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
35.9%
14W–25L · 45.4% of games
6.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
52.5%
21W–19L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
W
Miles Ulrich / Diane Leemixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jackie Valentine
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Nona Allison / Robert Fishmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Matthew Klutznick / Jenn Gilemixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimberly Wong
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jeanie Richardson / Rob Wardmixed
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie van Zyl
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Jared Groff / Neil Flodin
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kit Merker
−0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Yu Wang / Tianhui Zhou - (DQ)
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kit Merker
−0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Tom Dillard / Keith Wong
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Merrifield
−0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Rusty Warnock / Jerry Osborn
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diego Piacentini
+0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
WENSI LI / Yuxin Huang
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffrey Merrifield
−0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Matthew Thomas Allen / Chris Pratley
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Markus Mielke
−0.059below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yonggang Deng
+0.022about as expected — took 37% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kesav Kaliyaperumal
+0.005about as expected — took 42% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.