← Search

Miles Ulrich

Monroe, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 43W–41L · seasons 2021–2026
Where Miles sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Miles is one of 852 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 25% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Miles has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Miles has gone from the 50th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 54.8% of games
3.0
15%
3W–17L · 34.3% of games
6.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.9% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
Phillip Lu / Jackie Valentinemixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Robert Shen / Dana Laursenmixed
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Olson
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amanda Ortiz
+0.000about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.044better than expected — took 40% of games against 28% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Russ Arun / Jim Stanfill
2025-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Jovanovich
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Martin
−0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Ted Calhoon
2025-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Clifford Weiss / Thomas Natsis
2025-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Jovanovich
+0.040better than expected — took 57% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-05-03 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.012below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Christopher Landman
2025-04-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 3-0
W
Mohammad Forouzanfar
2025-03-27 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.