Teams

Personality Hires

2026 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-24vs Smash2026Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Lusty / Susan Williams vs Amy Olason / Christina Fitzpatrick7-6, 6-3
2026-07-21vs The RacqueteersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Lusty / Lisa Vincent vs Tonya Dressel / Kristin Bedard6-2, 6-2
2026-07-20vs The SunSetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Williams / Laura Kirkland vs Sallie Ragsdale / Catherine Maxson6-7, 4-6
2026-07-15vs ForzaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Williams / Carolyn Bardon vs Jillayna Campos / Teresa Engrav7-5, 6-3
2026-07-11vs 4 PackWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Vincent / Carolyn Bardon vs Estelle Erhardt / Shweta Omkaram6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-08vs The WildfiresWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Bardon / Laura Kirkland vs Irina Petriuc / Ioana Ungureanasu7-6, 6-4
2026-06-23vs WillgerodtLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Kirkland / Susan Williams vs Molly Adrian / Lynne Nowicki2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Laura Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Lisa Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Carolyn Bardon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Susan Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Susan Lusty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Cathy Lu
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Bardon + Lisa Vincent5158% games+9.9% vs expected
Cathy Lu + Susan Lusty8949% games+7.6% vs expected
Cathy Lu + Laura Kirkland7358% games+7.2% vs expected
Susan Lusty + Lisa Vincent2445% games+4.5% vs expected
Carolyn Bardon + Laura Kirkland4349% games−0.5% vs expected
Susan Lusty + Laura Kirkland3344% games−4.3% vs expected
Cathy Lu + Lisa Vincent4745% games−5.2% vs expected
Cathy Lu + Carolyn Bardon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laura Kirkland
31W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Lisa Vincent
48W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Carolyn Bardon
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Susan Williams
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Susan Lusty
61W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Cathy Lu
54W–73L career · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.