Search

Takako Chavez

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
48 of 63
WA · 3.0
536 of 755

Takako is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Takako has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Takako has gone from the 62nd to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
45.3%
34W–41L · 47.4% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
Rachel Wang
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.052below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Jillayna Campos / Vicki Cronin
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela King
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Laura Naden / Celeste Garcia Ramberg
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Jordt
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Jordt
+0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Carin Weiss
2026-05-01 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.016below expectation — took 53% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 1-2
L
Helen Jiang
2026-04-24 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.060below expectation — took 14% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Leah Snyder / Elizabeth Goodrich
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine DeStephano
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Porsha Kahlon / Krystle Peeters
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine DeStephano
+0.045better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Denise Angelone / Andreanna Kapogiannatos
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine DeStephano
+0.012about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 5-2
W
Judit Velcsov / Jenjira Hellers
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Bozick
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Michiko Kono / Suzanne Kalberer
2026-01-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Minori Yoshioka
2026-01-17 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.