← Search

Emily Christensen

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
141 matches · 94W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.50
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
52%
stay 3.5
48%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.42. Lower than today’s 3.50 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.5
8 of 45
WA · 3.5
94 of 1209

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 64th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
11W–0L · 75.1% of games
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 59.9% of games
3.5
69.9%
51W–22L · 58.9% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Chinn
−0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherry Ching
−0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Chinn
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.005better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Megan Lafountaine
2026-05-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.002about as expected — took 68% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.047better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joette Dalton
+0.036better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Roush
−0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Eleanor Gray / Tyra Heatherington
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yoshimi Gershaw
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-04-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.023better than expected — took 100% of games against 92% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.