← Search

Zena Heywood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history44 matches
W
2026-11-01 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debara Ferleman
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-10-25 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Lalime
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-10-18 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Lalime
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Raffetto
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Chan
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-18 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debara Ferleman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · RBW-Group Therapy 55-Wilkins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debara Ferleman
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-02 · RBW-Fabulous 55+ Gibson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Corinne Walsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-20 · RBW-Fabulous 55+ Gibson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nellie Bozick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-06 · RBW-Fabulous 55+ Gibson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-22 · RBW-Fabulous 55+ Gibson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-09-14 · RBW-Fabulous 55+ Gibson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katherine DeStephano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 48.2% of games
6.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer