Search

Patricia Brooke

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 38W–54L · seasons 20192025
Where Patricia sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Patricia is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Patricia has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Patricia has gone from the 17th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
36.2%
21W–37L · 44.6% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
W
2025-05-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Melissa Jamison / Natalie Warner
2025-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celia Evans
0.012about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Kexin Xu
2025-04-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celia Evans
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Jennifer Smith
2025-03-26 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.067better than expected — took 62% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Travers
+0.077better than expected — took 80% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Janet Brock / Tammy Miller
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Travers
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Manuel Moises / Oxana Aelionmixed
2024-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Nguyen
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jessica Bethune / Greg Brownmixed
2024-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minh Luong
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Salvadalena
0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Lo
0.010below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Wendy Walker / Carolyn McKernan
2024-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Winkler
0.016below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.