← Search

Sylvian Colley

Seattle, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
96 matches · 43W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.62. Higher than today’s 2.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
139 of 144
WA · 3.0
739 of 755

Sylvian is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sylvian has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sylvian has gone from the 41st to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 45.8% of games
6.0
51%
26W–25L · 49.3% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sun-Mi Ruth
−0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Juliet Friedl / Rives Kitchell
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sun-Mi Ruth
−0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Connie Manson / Mindy Rowe
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yan Mathison
−0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Markham
−0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Diana Jordt / Polly Wong
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Roehrs
+0.052better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Morse
−0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-09-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Markham
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Rui Huang / Asako Endo
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyung Mi Lee
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Hollar
−0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Nicoleta Cristache / Heather Robertson
2025-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Hollar
−0.055below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Tatyana Gordon / Kathy McPherson
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with In Young Jung
+0.031better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Lana Dunsmore / Corinne Dubedat
2025-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Holtgraves
+0.059better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.