Search

Annie Graebner

BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 47W–13L · seasons 20192026
Where Annie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Annie is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Annie has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Annie has gone from the 56th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 76.4% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.9% of games
4.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinah Satterwhite
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey McFadden
0.033below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey McFadden
+0.057better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Franklin
0.037below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fatima Wallin
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fatima Wallin
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Page
+0.019better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fatima Wallin
0.040below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Kathleen Green / Tina L Garcia
2025-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Franklin
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-05-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.053better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Nancy Chan / Gina Jaffe
2024-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinah Satterwhite
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Franklin
+0.026better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.