← Search

Steven Hanson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
OLYMPIA, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 43W–45L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history88 matches
L
2026-04-10 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Nojima
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-20 · VAC-Casebier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-13 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Pace
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
W
N/A
2025-05-30 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Pace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-23 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rex Schade
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-05-08 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-02 · VAC-Casebier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Holmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-24 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Stillman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-04-18 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Holmer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-11 · VAC-Casebier · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-04-14 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Vandermark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-07 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Vandermark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.4% of games
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.8% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert