Search

Richard Graham

Olympia, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
201 matches · 131W–70L · seasons 20192025
Where Richard sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Richard is one of 856 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams70 teams · 2002–2027
VAC-Engle
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2027
Davis/Graham
2025 One Doubles-Winter · 4.0 Men
2025
SWW-VAC-Leimback
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
VAC-Leimback-VAC 55's
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed
2025
SWW-VAC-Clerget
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2025
VAC-Stormans
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Richard has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Richard has gone from the 72nd to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
73.2%
30W–11L · 59.5% of games
7.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 63% of games
8.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.6% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80.8%
21W–5L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
28W–21L · 54.6% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history201 matches
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Roy Seeman
0.057below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Matt Purcell
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-10 · VAC-Stormans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · VAC-Stormans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-19 · VAC-Stormans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tristan Wise
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Matthew Sheets / Matthew Harris
2025-04-12 · Davis/Graham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Davis
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-12 · VAC-Leimback-VAC 55's · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Blackwell-Schrag
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-06 · VAC-Leimback-VAC 55's · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Keck
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-03-30 · VAC-Leimback-VAC 55's · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Keck
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-29 · VAC-Stormans · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Doug Hungerford / Deanna Hungerfordmixed
2025-03-23 · VAC-Stormans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-03-16 · VAC-Stormans · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Koeppen
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.