Teams

VAC-Leimback-VAC 55's

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

4 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Roy Seeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Angela Keck
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
Richard Graham
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
Results4 ties
2025-04-12Split 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Graham / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Matt Grant / Patti Johnson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoy Seeman / Angela Keck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-06Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRoy Seeman / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Kurt Bethman / Rene Ketchum2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Graham / Angela Keck vs Colleen Sharkey / Michael Davis4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Graham / Angela Keck vs Rene Ketchum / Kurt Bethman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoy Seeman / Debra Blackwell-Schrag vs Rene Ketchum / Kurt Bethman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Roy Seeman
95W–40L career
1%97%2%
3.81
4
Debra Blackwell-Schrag
143W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Richard Graham
131W–70L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.