← Search

Debra Blackwell-Schrag

Olympia, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 143W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debra Blackwell-Schrag to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Julie Porrazzo / Danna Riordan
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Henning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · VAC-Myers/Hoy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Keck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-22 · VAC-Myers/Hoy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Keck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Catherine Mcnaughton / Jessica Riippi
2026-02-07 · VAC-Myers/Hoy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Hoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Melanie Redding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-12-07 · SWW-VAC-Redding · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Redding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams126 teams · 2012–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
81.1%
73W–17L · 60.7% of games
4.5
37%
17W–29L · 43.6% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 55.7% of games
8.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 61.7% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 57.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
48 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe