← Search

Joy Henning

SANTA PAULA, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 166W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joy Henning to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history269 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Pink Moments · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Gann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · Tri To Stop Us · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · Tri To Stop Us · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathrina Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · Tri To Stop Us · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Battles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-14 · Ojai Pixies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · FOMO (Fear of Mission Oaks) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Giancarlo Bertumen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · Ojai Pixies · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Blackwell-Schrag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · FOMO (Fear of Mission Oaks) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Douglas Henning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
68%
151W–71L · 56.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games
8.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.4% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.9% of games
9.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
34 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe