← Search

Janet Fang-Putinier

Oak Park, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 145W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Fang-Putinier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
W
2026-09-13 · WACsadaisical · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soukup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · In Our WAC Era · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nooshin Samadani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · In Our WAC Era · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Soukup
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · In Our WAC Era · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Chababi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · In Our WAC Era · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ezgi Tunc Kohler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Westlake Athletic Club · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Dudeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · In Our WAC Era · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nooshin Samadani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · WACsadaisical · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · Westlake Athletic Club · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Dudeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · WACsadaisical · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanja Daniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Westlake Athletic Club · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Dudeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · Westlake Athletic Club · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Wilde mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
67.3%
103W–50L · 56.2% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 67.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams