← Search

Kristina Weaver

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PORT HUENEME, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
354 matches · 238W–116L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history354 matches
W
2026-10-10 · Mission Oaks Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ghazala Trotter
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · Mission Oaks Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Yew
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-28 · Mission Oaks Wrecking Balls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roberta Reis
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · Mission Oaks Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Culhane
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
Default
2026-09-26 · Valle Lindo Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Barlow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-14 · Mission Oaks Wrecking Balls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mignonne Nieva
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-06 · V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristine Werner championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-05 · V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristine Werner championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-09-05 · V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madeleine Lindvall championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-16 · V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Medina
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · Valle Lindo Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasia Domenech
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · V- LLW MO Match Point Mavens 8.0- Yoshimura · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kasia Domenech
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
67.9%
125W–59L · 57.5% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 37.7% of games
7.5
81.8%
36W–8L · 61.2% of games
8.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 60.6% of games
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 73% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
20W–15L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
151 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
76 matches
#1 Singles
4%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe