← Search

Nahed Stefany

Ventura, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
424 matches · 267W–157L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nahed Stefany to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history424 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Fly high Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexis Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · Fifty Women's Mission · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Convery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Fifty Women's Mission · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sandy Eicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · Fifty Women's Mission · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Whitlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Pierpont Spring Flowers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darcie Ouerbacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · Pierpont Spring Flowers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Convery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-19 · VC Mind Set 99 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alan Siu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Pierpont Spring Flowers · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lola Tennison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexis Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · VC Mind Set 99 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with RJ Marozzi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · Pierpont Spring Flowers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Pierpont Spring Flowers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with TRACY GUILLEN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 54.3% of games
4.0
76.6%
151W–46L · 59.4% of games
4.5
50%
56W–56L · 49.7% of games
8.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 63% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
193 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
128 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
86 matches
#1 Singles
3%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert