Search

Tanja Daniel

Simi Valley, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
319 matches · 146W–173L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 51 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
90%
stay 4.0
10%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.84. Lower than today’s 3.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
CA · 4.0
82 of 432
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Tanja is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tanja has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tanja has gone from the 39th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34% of games
4.0
52.1%
112W–103L · 51.5% of games
4.5
28.2%
20W–51L · 42.3% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history319 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christa Nonnemaker
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Julie Barrier / Zofia Tan
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Kasia Domenech / Kristina Weaver
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramona Halloran
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Tracee Nilsson / Lauren Koenig
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramona Halloran
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Suzanne Cumbo / Michelle Tong Luo
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Nardiello
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Sharon Li / Wyne Quinn
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Guinn
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Fang-Putinier
0.004about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Lynn Severn / Keely McKnight
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Sherline
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Monica Bjork / Heather Gudger
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Sherline
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Mayna Londt / Ryan Shanleymixed
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with RJ Marozzi
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Miri Mizrahi / Jennifer Stewart
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Sherline
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.