← Search

Tanja Daniel

Simi Valley, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
328 matches · 150W–178L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tanja Daniel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history328 matches
L
2026-09-13 · WACsadaisical · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Samira Sizdahkhani / Stephanie Meyer
2026-09-11 · Topspinners/Malott-Sherline/Calabasas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ghazaleh Soltani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · Fifty Women's Mission · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jill Gann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · WAC Net-Workers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Sherline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-02 · Fifty Women's Mission · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christa Nonnemaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-12 · WAC Net-Workers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · WAC Net-Workers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramona Halloran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · WAC Net-Workers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramona Halloran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Nardiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · WAC Net-Workers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackie Guinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · WACsadaisical · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Fang-Putinier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34% of games
4.0
52%
117W–108L · 51.3% of games
4.5
26.5%
18W–50L · 42.2% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.3% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
189 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe