← Search

Cheri Ackermann

Moorpark, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 133W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheri Ackermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Tightly Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · Royal Aces 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Royal Aces 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Royal Aces 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Royal Aces 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Royal Aces 55+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-01 · Like Fine Wine · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Like Fine Wine · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with SANDI WISE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · with Wendy Schoenburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · Royal Aces 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
Karen Friedman / Eileen Kakoyiannis
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Wendy Schoenburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Moorpark Acing Gracefully Sp26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Schoenburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
78.4%
40W–11L · 59.7% of games
4.0
54.2%
77W–65L · 53.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 57% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe