← Search

Beth Bearer

Calabasas, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 87W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Bearer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-07-25 · WAC Net-Workers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Cumbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · WAC Net-Workers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Cumbo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · DAM Ball WACkers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-14 · WAC Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Mealer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Westlake WARRIORS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mika Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · Westlake WARRIORS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Sue Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · DAM Ball WACkers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Dalea mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · Westlake WARRIORS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Scotti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Sue Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · WAC Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynda Balletta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · DAM Ball WACkers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Curtis Cutting mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
44.1%
45W–57L · 49.4% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.8% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 48.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
34%
18W–35L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
10W–15L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams