Search

Christopher Jones

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
29 matches · 10W–19L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
315 of 357
OR · 3.0
524 of 600

Christopher is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christopher has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Christopher has gone from the 13th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history29 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rowan Seals
0.028below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Graham Rykiel / Michael Olson
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Paul Mendoza
0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Joseph M Heffernan III / Paul Kim
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erik Guttormsen
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Paul Mendoza
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Ramshaw
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
0.023below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Ian Little / Paul Kim
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Foster
+0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rowan Seals
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Sanjay Ramanathan / Mauro Kobrinsky
2025-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Avalon
0.048below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
0.005below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.006about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Ramshaw
0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.