Search

Rowan Seals

Kelso, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
33 matches · 12W–21L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
13%
stay 2.5
87%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 57% stay · 43% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.49. Lower than today’s 2.59 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
14 of 35

Rowan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rowan has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rowan has gone from the 4th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.3% of games
3.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.1% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-06-13 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christopher Jones
0.028below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Kenny Ristau / Calvin Hsieh
2026-05-31 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.039better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Bj Park / Brentley Boger
2026-05-17 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Adam Bucci / Bennett Anderson
2026-05-10 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.053better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Alexander Abrazaldo / Austin Tucker
2026-04-25 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wesley Eader
0.017below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Bert Stevens
2026-04-04 · MV-Chace/Ramshaw · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · MV-Chace/Schill · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Mitchell
0.015below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4
L
Michael Olson / Alexander Abrazaldo
2026-02-22 · MV-Chace/Schill · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.010about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
6-4
W
Matthew Nguyen / Bryan Kha
2026-02-07 · MV-Chace/Schill · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.092better than expected — took 60% of games against 29% expected
6-4
W
2025-11-16 · MV-Chace/Schill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maggie Miller
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · MV-Chace/Schill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maggie Miller
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-01 · MV-Chace/Schill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maggie Miller
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.