Search

Carrie Schill

Longview, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
56 matches · 33W–23L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Longview · 3.0
4 of 7
WA · 3.0
529 of 755

Carrie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carrie has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Carrie has gone from the 1st to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.3% of games
3.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 41.8% of games
6.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Schill
+0.068better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Azure Olson / Cynthia Ross-Brockett
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tuni Stecker
+0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tuni Stecker
+0.102better than expected — took 75% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Schill
+0.017better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Schill
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Gloria Pacheco / Heidi Seinige
2026-03-01 · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Hailey Straube
0.022about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3
W
Jenny Co / Angeline Vu
2026-02-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Maggie Miller
0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4
W
Ryann Hulme
2026-01-10 · #1 Female Singles · 6.0
+0.020better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
6-5
W
Elana Grabel / Alysia Yamasaki
2026-01-03 · #1 Female Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Schill
+0.047better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-3
L
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Vail
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Vail
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hunter Chace
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 16% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.