Search

Elana Grabel

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
23 matches · 8W–15L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
309 of 357
OR · 3.0
512 of 600

Elana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elana has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.7% of games
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history23 matches
L
Phyllis Shen
2026-06-07 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Perry · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.027better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Maggie Ma
2026-05-30 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Perry · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.015better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 5-3
L
Greta Miracle / Kim Wallace
2026-05-17 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Perry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pearl Dixon
0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Perry · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Lilian Tsi Stielstra
2026-03-29 · PT&E/SJRC-Gay/Perry · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.079better than expected — took 92% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Skye Larsen
2026-02-14 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Yamasaki · #1 Female Singles · 6.0
0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2
L
Jessica Li
2026-02-01 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Yamasaki · #1 Female Singles · 6.0
0.021below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0
L
Hanmin Wang / Chili He
2026-01-18 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Yamasaki · #2 Mixed Doubles · 6.0 · with Brendan Adamczyk
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2
W
2026-01-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Yamasaki · #1 Female Singles · 6.0
+0.058better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-1
L
2025-11-16 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Perry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Davis Carlisle
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Kalpana Berman / Bishnu Patramixed
2025-11-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Perry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brendan Adamczyk
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-17 · PT&E/SJRC-Adamczyk/Perry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bo Jacober
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.