Search

Julia Daigneault

LAKE OSWEGO, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
41 matches · 14W–27L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
99%
stay 2.5
1%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 2.5
50 of 61

Julia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julia has been 2.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.02.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Julia has gone from the 1st to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 45.6% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–10L · 16.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
W
Stephanie Barnes / Susan Curtin
2026-07-13 · The Volunteers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Hoxie
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Kirstin Martin / Elva Li
2026-07-10 · The Volunteers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julie Hoxie
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Louis Fontenot Jr / Andrea Sommermixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Douglas Bennett
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Brenda Elliott / Katherine FitzGibbon
2026-06-28 · The Volunteers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jennifer West
+0.035better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Lilia Boyer / Jon Lavietesmixed
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Douglas Bennett
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Press
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Hyun Jeong Min / Donghyup Ryumixed
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jason Lee
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Heather Long / Sarah Baker
2026-06-23 · The Volunteers · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brooke Carlson
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sanam Dowlatdad / Cecily Schmidtchamps
2026-06-21 · NOR-MPRC-Daigneault · #1 Doubles · with Eve T.
0.011below expectation — took 8% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
April Chiang / Emily Booth
2026-06-05 · NOR-MPRC-Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brooke Carlson
0.034below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Antoinette Johnson / Natalie Clouse
2026-05-10 · NOR-MPRC-Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eve T.
0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Sarah Schubert / China Forbes
2026-04-25 · NOR-MPRC-Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nandhini Paranjpe
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.