← Search

Saerom Yoo

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
7 matches · 3W–4L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.0
98%
stay 2.5
0%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
107 of 122
OR · 2.5
185 of 206
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Saerom is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Saerom has been a steady 2.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.02.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history7 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Jones
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Jones
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Jones
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Jones
+0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emma Morgan-mcleod
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
Beth Gregory
2025-04-05 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Angela Diaz de Leon
−0.010below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.