Search

Douglas Bennett

Portland, OR
2.5C year-end 2025
186 matches · 67W–119L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
24%
stay 2.5
76%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 70% stay · 30% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.46. Lower than today’s 2.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 2.5
13 of 34
OR · 2.5
26 of 61

Douglas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams54 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Douglas has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Douglas has gone from the 36th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 56.6% of games
3.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 40.2% of games
6.0
34.1%
14W–27L · 43.6% of games
2.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
31.7%
20W–43L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history186 matches
L
Hyun Jeong Min / Donghyup Ryumixed
2026-07-26 · WHRC-Daigneault · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Sahu
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Susan Grabe / T Wayne Grabemixed
2026-07-19 · WHRC-Daigneault · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anca Tudorache
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Ed Keene / Heather Davidsonchamps
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Young · #3 Doubles · with Sue Donora
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Forrest Reda / Neesha Tandonchamps
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Young · #3 Doubles · with Sue Donora
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Matthew Campbell / Juliet Friedlchamps
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Young · #2 Doubles · with Sue Donora
0.062below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Louis Fontenot Jr / Andrea Sommermixed
2026-07-05 · WHRC-Daigneault · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julia Daigneault
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lilia Boyer / Jon Lavietesmixed
2026-06-27 · WHRC-Daigneault · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Julia Daigneault
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leanne Kong
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Nancy Rosenbloom / Jason Jobmixed
2026-04-18 · MPRC-Tompkins/Alfonso · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Donora
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-15 · THPRD-Young · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ed de la Fuente
0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · THPRD-Young · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Westrum
0.042below expectation — took 0% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-07 · THPRD-Young · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Masafumi Inoue
0.024below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.