Teams

THPRD-Young

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Winston Young
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Aaron Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Masafumi Inoue
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Ed de la Fuente
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Norman Langston
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Keith Westrum
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Terrence Trausch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Douglas Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.52
George Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Winston Young
57W–59L career
0%80%20%
3.01
3
Aaron Bowman
30W–58L career
0%92%8%
2.92
3
Masafumi Inoue
98W–92L career
1%95%3%
2.81
3
Ed de la Fuente
78W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Norman Langston
28W–53L career
3%95%3%
2.78
3
Keith Westrum
60W–52L career
1%97%1%
2.78
3
Terrence Trausch
25W–49L career
2%97%0%
2.72
2.5
Douglas Bennett
67W–119L career
0%20%80%
2.56
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
34%66%0%
2.52

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.