Search

ROSS GREEN

Wilsonville, OR
2.5C year-end 2024
44 matches · 11W–33L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.29
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
100%
stay 2.5
0%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 2.5
51 of 61

ROSS is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ROSS has been 2.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.5202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 42.2% of games
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.5% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-05-01 · CRRC-Mosbrucker/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alana Miner
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · CRRC-Mosbrucker/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheri Mosbrucker
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-04 · CRRC-Mosbrucker/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Roozenboom
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-03 · CRRC-Mosbrucker/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alana Miner
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Tracy Laidley - * / Fred Kowellmixed
2026-03-27 · CRRC-Mosbrucker/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alana Miner
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Andy Ostrom / Trask Court
2026-03-22 · CRRC-Johnson/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victor ILAU
+0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
CHRISTOP JOHNSON / Mazyar Afshar
2026-03-21 · CRRC-Johnson/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Feiner
0.018below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Steve Farnham / Todd Burch
2026-03-20 · SHC-Woller · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Deon Logan
+0.061better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jeff Towle / Paul Cedfeldt
2026-03-15 · SHC-Woller · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Aaron Geiger
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Suk Chung / Donghyup Ryu
2026-02-13 · SHC-Woller · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jeff Hilden
+0.022better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Paul Choi / Kyu Hun Kim
2026-02-07 · CRRC-Johnson/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victor ILAU
+0.047better than expected — took 53% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ken Naffziger / Jon Lavietes
2026-01-03 · SHC-Woller · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Aaron Geiger
0.071below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.