Teams

THPRD-Stevenson

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Paul Garrahan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.27
Joel Naumoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Zachary Wright
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
2.95
David Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Brian Hefele
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Jay Hopson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Martin Sommer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Scott Soot
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Brian Chenoweth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Brian Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Fred Buller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.26
Kip Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul Garrahan
129W–39L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Joel Naumoff
60W–31L career
2%97%1%
3.27
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–141L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3
David Graham
46W–35L career
0%89%11%
2.95
3
Brian Hefele
36W–29L career
2%83%15%
2.88
3
Jay Hopson
38W–30L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3.5
Martin Sommer
7W–4L career
71%29%0%
2.84
3
Scott Soot
35W–43L career
0%97%2%
2.82
3
Brian Chenoweth
36W–52L career
0%99%1%
2.78
3
Brian Parker
36W–48L career
1%99%0%
2.75
3
Fred Buller
22W–18L career
10%89%2%
2.70
2.5
Kip Stevenson
35W–94L career
0%92%8%
2.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.