← Search

Marcia Howell

Anchorage, AK
0.0 year-end
101 matches · 45W–56L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Marcia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Marcia is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marcia has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Marcia has gone from the 65th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 46.3% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.7% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.1% of games
7.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.9% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.3% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Griffin
−0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Dana Griffin
+0.005about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Barbara Johns / Jana Vojdani
2026-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Wulf
−0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Shari Harris / Linda Richardi
2026-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Gugliotto
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 7-5
L
Hilary Quinn / Jill Wright
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Gugliotto
−0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Carolyn Sewell / Donna Simpson
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Wulf
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-4
W
Catherine Wilson / Pamela Tondreau
2026-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Wulf
+0.033better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Lesley Gagnon / Maribeth Pullman
2026-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheri Wulf
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
W
Lea Tkatch / Ilse Hine
2025-12-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blossom Cohon
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Linda Westwick / Stacia Green
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alice Knapp
+0.032better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-12-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacia Green
+0.002better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Christina Cooley / Wanda Ramos
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Finger
−0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.