Teams

Making It Happen!

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.64 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-11vs AK-TAC-KorshinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlice Knapp / Marcia Howell vs Linda Westwick / Stacia Green2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Bidwell / Denise Henderson vs Triin Minton / Marlys Morton6-2, 6-3
2025-12-11vs AK-TAC-KorshinLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrena Rairdon / Janet Bidwell vs April Korshin / Marlys Morton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Griffin / Karen Loeffler vs ELIZE Rumley / Catherine Stone3-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs AK-TAC-KorshinLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlice Knapp / Karen Loeffler vs ELIZE Rumley / Linda Westwick2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Denise Henderson vs Triin Minton / April Korshin3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Trena Rairdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Alice Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Denise Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Janet Bidwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Duclos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Loeffler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Marcia Howell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Griffin + Jennifer Duclos7651% games−3.0% vs expected
Marcia Howell + Dana Griffin2736% gamesnot enough data
Alice Knapp + Karen Loeffler033 matchesnot enough data
Denise Henderson + Trena Rairdon303 matchesnot enough data
Dana Griffin + Karen Loeffler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Trena Rairdon
42W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Alice Knapp
46W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Denise Henderson
21W–22L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Janet Bidwell
20W–43L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Duclos
76W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
0
Marcia Howell
45W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.