← Search

Dana Griffin

Anchorage, AK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 111W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Griffin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
2026-07-01 · AK-TAC-Steller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brock Steller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Marcia Howell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Marcia Howell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Leilah Hemmen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · Team 7 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · Team 7 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-23 · Team 7 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · Team 7 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Whitfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-11 · Making It Happen! · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Loeffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-02 · Penny & the Jets! · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · Team 8 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Larson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-21 · Penny & the Jets! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 47.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 48.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.7% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
33W–15L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.6%
18W–19L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
46 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer