← Search

Dana Griffin

Anchorage, AK
3.5C year-end 2025
197 matches · 111W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Anchorage · 3.5
20 of 20
AK · 3.5
22 of 23

Dana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dana has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Dana has gone from the 78th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level12 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 50% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 36.6% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 48.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
68.8%
33W–15L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.6%
18W–19L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history197 matches
W
Victoria Yu / Douglas Heniemixed
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brock Steller
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Marcia Howell
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Marcia Howell
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Leilah Hemmen
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Martin
+0.000below expectation — took 46% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Whitfield
+0.000below expectation — took 63% of games against 72% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-12-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Loeffler
−0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Yu
+0.076better than expected — took 92% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
James Robinson / Natalie Meyeraanmixed
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Larson
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Yu
−0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.