← Search

Song Bliss

Eagle River, AK
3.0C year-end 2025
149 matches · 63W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
AK · 3.0
14 of 16

Song is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Song has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Song has gone from the 38th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.1% of games
3.0
45.9%
17W–20L · 54.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 35.8% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 83.1% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 42.5% of games
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.3% of games
6.0mixed
58.5%
24W–17L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
24%
6W–19L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Henie
+0.000better than expected — took 40% of games against 18% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Bliss
+0.000better than expected — took 41% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Janelle Leavell / Monica Grassmanmixedchamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Kathy McArthur
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Kathy McArthur
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Cecilia Hopper
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Penny Rohacek / Kai Sims
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Raymond-Yakoubian
−0.049below expectation — took 41% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Penny Rohacek / Eleanor Morse
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Brudie
+0.011better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Sherry Sedwick / Victoria Yu
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 2-4
L
Victoria Yu / Kathryn Hoke
2026-04-04 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Bernie Ruskin
−0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Karen Loeffler / Kathryn Hoke
2026-03-29 · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Oksana Lysiuk
−0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Xochitl Foster
+0.012better than expected — took 58% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Marlene Dodge / Daniel Whitfieldmixed
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Clendaniel
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.