← Search

Cecilia Hopper

Anchorage, AK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 42W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Hopper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Cynthia Henie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Cynthia Henie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Song Bliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-07 · Team 7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · Team 7 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Carlson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-21 · AK-TAC-Wyzykowski · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · AK-TAC-Wyzykowski · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-24 · Slamm’n CC’s · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-21 · Slamm’n CC’s · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-07-19 · Slamm’n CC’s · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-15 · Slamm’n CC’s · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-09 · Slamm’n CC’s · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
70%
7W–3L · 65.5% of games
3.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 33.5% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams