Search

Cecilia Hopper

Anchorage, AK
3.0C year-end 2025
79 matches · 42W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 10% stay · 90% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Lower than today’s 3.25 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Anchorage · 3.0
1 of 9
AK · 3.0
2 of 16

Cecilia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cecilia has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Cecilia has gone from the 46th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
0.0
70%
7W–3L · 65.5% of games
3.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.4% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 33.5% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
Shannan Murphy-Barlow / Kirsten Rey-Rosamixedchamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Cynthia Henie
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Rhonda Baker / Kelley Schultzmixedchamps
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Cynthia Henie
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Song Bliss
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Eric Jostsons / Song Blissmixed
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Green
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Carlson
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lynn Thomas / Deborah Svendsen
2025-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Bernie Ruskin / Deborah Svendsen
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.088better than expected — took 100% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Xochitl Foster / Eleanor Morse
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
0.016about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.013better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Xochitl Foster / Eleanor Morse
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.024better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Cynthia Henie
+0.031better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.