Teams

AK-TAC-Morton

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-10vs April's AngelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarlys Morton / Triin Minton vs Conita Mullett / Karen Loeffler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacia Green / Marcia Howell vs ELIZE Rumley / Christie Wyzykowski6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Henderson / Leilah Hemmen vs Catherine Stone / Susan Brunner4-6, 3-6
2025-11-23vs April's AngelsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDenise Henderson / Leilah Hemmen vs Karen Loeffler / Conita Mullett4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarlys Morton / Triin Minton vs Catherine Stone / Christie Wyzykowski6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs April's AngelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTriin Minton / Stacia Green vs Conita Mullett / April Korshin6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMarcia Howell / Dana Griffin vs Susan Brunner / ELIZE Rumley0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Henderson / Leilah Hemmen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-05vs April's AngelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Griffin / Denise Henderson vs April Korshin / Susan Brunner6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTriin Minton / Stacia Green vs Christie Wyzykowski / Karen Loeffler6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMarlys Morton / Leilah Hemmen vs Catherine Stone / Conita Mullett4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Denise Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Triin Minton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.44
Stacia Green
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Marlys Morton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Leilah Hemmen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Marcia Howell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Triin Minton + Marlys Morton353851% games−1.6% vs expected
Denise Henderson + Stacia Green1441% games−12.8% vs expected
Marcia Howell + Dana Griffin2736% gamesnot enough data
Stacia Green + Triin Minton5173% gamesnot enough data
Stacia Green + Marlys Morton1436% gamesnot enough data
Denise Henderson + Leilah Hemmen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Henderson
21W–22L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Triin Minton
123W–112L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Stacia Green
93W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Marlys Morton
161W–112L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Leilah Hemmen
35W–23L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 6 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
0
Marcia Howell
45W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.